Three ways to put the Trust in front of the people who fund buildings.

What is real here, and what is not

Every figure on these pages — 320 learners, four blocks, sixteen levels, the KES 38,050,000 five-year total and its line items — comes from the Trust's Strategic Plan. The photography is the school's own. Where copy does not exist yet, the page says so out loud with a [Draft copy — school to supply] marker rather than inventing a story.

Three things are deliberately unfinished, because they are the Trust's decisions rather than design ones: the donation channel (every Donate button is a placeholder — there is no payment link yet), learner and parent stories (needs consent), and naming-rights wording (needs trustee approval).

The three directions

Each solves a different reader. They are not colour swaps of each other — the structure, the type and the order of the argument all change.

Direction 01

Trust & Governance

For embassy grant officers and corporate foundations who read like auditors.

• The Trust and the school are separated on the first screen
• The full CAPEX table, with unit rates and phases, as a document
• Governance stated as auditable facts, not sentiment

Lead with it if they want to look like an institution that has been running for twenty years.

Open direction 01 →

Direction 02

The Inclusion Story

For individual philanthropists, and CSR officers who need something to take to a committee.

• Four pillars become four photographic bands, not cards
• Year one's KES 18,000,000 separated from the five-year total
• Scale stated honestly once, in one stat band

Lead with it if they want to open with children rather than spreadsheets — this is the closest to Kenya Education Fund.

Open direction 02 →

Direction 03

Sponsor a Line Item

For funding one capital item outright — an infrastructure grant, or a single large corporate gift.

• Prices are the layout: KES 250,000 per floor of railings versus KES 8,500,000 for the bus
• A floor-by-floor estate diagram, colour-coded by funding phase
• Naming rights presented as a ladder, not a footnote

Lead with it if they want the site to work like a campaign page instead of a brochure.

Open direction 03 →

What we need from the Trust to take this further